Compare phones
Motorola W175
W175, W175g, W180| Global Score | |
| 28.6 | 26.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.1 |
| 2007-10-11 | 2006-09-12 |
| 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches | 4.60 x 2.74 x 0.55 inches |
| 2.99 ounces | 5.10 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 39.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| STN | TFT |
| 101 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 3.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 81,92 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | miniSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.5 |
| GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 940mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time | 336 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola W175 is just a bit better than Nokia E62, getting a 28.6 score against 26.2. The Motorola W175 is a way lighter device than Nokia E62, but they are 0.55inches thick. The Motorola W175 and the Nokia E62 both have incredibly similar CPUs, they have the same number of cores. The Motorola W175 features a much more vibrant display than Nokia E62, although it has a much lower 128 x 128 resolution.
Nokia E62 and Motorola W175 count with extremely similar cameras. Nokia E62 has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola W175. Nokia E62 counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola W175, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity instead of 940mAh.
Motorola W175 costs a bit more money than Nokia E62, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.