Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.8 | 31.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.1 |
| -- | 2005-11-02 |
| 3.74 x 1.81 x 0.66 inches | 3.75 x 1.96 x 0.92 inches |
| 0.20 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| $ 260.00 | $ 245.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 352 x 416 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| 101 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 3.1 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 61,44 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | miniSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.5 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 3.00 MP |
| -- | f/3.50 aperture |
| 0 | 5.06 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| GPRS and GSM | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 2.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 880mAh Li-Ion Battery | 820mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 290 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 192 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.2 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia N80 has an overall score of 31.4, which is slightly better than Motorola W220's 28.8 global score. Although it's the best phone in this review, Nokia N80 is a much thicker and extremely heavier phone than Motorola W220. Nokia N80 counts with a CPU that's very similar to Motorola W220's processing unit, they have 0 processing cores.
The Motorola W220 has a lot better looking screen than Nokia N80, although it has a lot lower resolution of 128 x 128. The Nokia N80 counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola W220. Nokia N80 counts with a lot better camera than Motorola W220. Motorola W220 has a little better battery life than Nokia N80, because it has a 7% bigger battery capacity.
The Nokia N80 is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.