Compare phones
Sharp FX
STX-2
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 28.8 | 31.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sharp |
| -- | 2010-07-19 |
| 3.74 x 1.81 x 0.66 inches | 4.20 x 2.20 x 0.60 inches |
| 0.20 ounces | 5.00 ounces |
| $ 260.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 3 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 240 x 400 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| 101 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Yes |
| 5.2 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 81,92 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.82 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 2.00 MP |
| 0 | 4.73 |
| GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 880mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1240mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 290 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.96 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| FM Radio | -- |
| -- | Digital TV Broadcast |
Comparison review
Sharp FX is a bit better than the Motorola W220, getting a score of 31.7 against 28.8. Sharp FX's design is noticeably heavier but a little thinner than Motorola W220. Sharp FX features a brighter screen than Motorola W220, because it has a way greater screen pixels density and a lot better 400 x 240 pixels resolution.
The Sharp FX's CPU is very similar to the processor in Motorola W220, both of them have a 0-Core processor. Sharp FX features a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola W220, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 32 GB. Sharp FX counts with a really longer battery life than Motorola W220, because it has a 41 percent more battery size.
The Sharp FX has a very superior camera than Motorola W220.
The Sharp FX is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.