Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.8 | 31.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 0000-00-00 | 2005-11-08 |
| 4.37 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches | 3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches |
| 2.82 ounces | 3.49 ounces |
| $ 139.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.6 inches | -- |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 176 x 220 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| 113 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 940mAh Li-Ion Battery | 740mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 450 hours standby time 9.2 hours talk time | 215 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.16 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola RAZR V3c has a global score of 31.2, which is slightly better than the Motorola W230's general score of 28.8. The Motorola RAZR V3c is a just a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone than Motorola W230. Motorola W230 has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola RAZR V3c, although it has a way worse resolution of 128 x 128.
Motorola RAZR V3c counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Motorola W230, although it has no SD memory card expansion slot. The Motorola RAZR V3c's processing unit is just as good as the processing unit in Motorola W230, they have a 0-Core processing unit. The Motorola W230 features longer battery performance than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has 940mAh of battery capacity against 740mAh.
The Motorola RAZR V3c shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola W230.
Motorola RAZR V3c is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.