Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.3 | 31 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2007-05-03 |
| 3.74 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches | 4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.17 ounces | 2.32 ounces |
| $ 95.00 | $ 85.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.6 inches | -- |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 113 pixels per inch | 73 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 4.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 940mAh Li-Ion Battery | 700mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 432 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | 320 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.08 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 2630 has a global score of 31, which is just a bit better than the Motorola W260g's 28.3 general score. Nokia 2630 is a way lighter and much thinner phone than Motorola W260g. Motorola W260g has a sharper screen than Nokia 2630, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 128 x 128, it also counts with a lot higher pixel amount per display inch.
The Nokia 2630 features a processor that's just as good as the processing unit in Motorola W260g, both of them have the same number of cores. The Nokia 2630 takes way better pictures and videos than Motorola W260g. Nokia 2630 features a much greater storage for applications and games than Motorola W260g.
The Motorola W260g has greater battery life than Nokia 2630, because it has a 34 percent larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Nokia 2630 is also cheaper than the Motorola W260g.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.