Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.3 | 31 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 8.0 |
| -- | 2005-02-14 |
| 3.74 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches | 4.28 x 2.17 x 0.81 inches |
| 3.17 ounces | 4.69 ounces |
| $ 95.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.6 inches | -- |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 176 x 208 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 113 pixels per inch | 94 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 10,24 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | RS-MMC external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| GSM | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 940mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 432 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.2 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6680 has a global score of 31, which is just a bit better than Motorola W260g's 28.3 score. The Nokia 6680 body is notably heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola W260g. Nokia 6680 has a CPU that is just as good as the Motorola W260g one, both have 0 processing cores. Motorola W260g counts with just a bit better display than Nokia 6680, because although it has a way worse resolution of 128 x 128, it also counts with a bit higher display pixels density.
The Nokia 6680 has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola W260g. The Motorola W260g has a little longer battery duration than Nokia 6680, because it has 940mAh of battery capacity. The Nokia 6680 takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola W260g.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Nokia 6680 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.