Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.6 | 25.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| 2008-01-07 | 2007-05-03 |
| 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches | 4.01 x 1.73 x 0.68 inches |
| 3.30 ounces | 2.71 ounces |
| $ 100.00 | $ 80.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 98 x 68 pixels |
| STN | STN |
| -- | 43 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 4.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 4,1 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 940mAh Li-Ion Battery | 700mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | 365 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.08 |
Comparison review
Motorola W270 has a general score of 25.6, which is a bit better than Nokia 1208's score of 25.5. Although the Motorola W270 and the Nokia 1208 were released only 8 months apart, the Motorola W270 design is heavier but also somewhat thinner than the Nokia 1208. The Nokia 1208 counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola W270, although it has a way worse 68 x 98 resolution.
The Nokia 1208 counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the Motorola W270 one, both have the same number of cores. The Nokia 1208 features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola W270, although it has no SD card slot. The Motorola W270 and the Nokia 1208 both have incredibly similar cameras.
Motorola W270 counts with greater battery life than Nokia 1208, because it has a 34% greater battery size.
Although Motorola W270 is a better device, it is more expensive than the Nokia 1208, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Nokia 1208. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Motorola W270, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Nokia 1208, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.