Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.3 | 27.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2004-11-02 |
| 3.89 x 1.77 x 0.73 inches | 4.17 x 1.73 x 0.79 inches |
| 3.35 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 505.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 1,02 MB internal memory | 3,58 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 880mAh Li-Ion Battery | 760mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 210 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 330 hours standby time 3 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.16 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6020 is a bit better than Motorola W355, getting a score of 27.7 against 25.3. Nokia 6020's design is somewhat lighter but just a little bit thicker than Motorola W355. The Nokia 6020 counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the processing unit in Motorola W355, both have 0 processing cores.
The Nokia 6020 and Motorola W355 count with really similar displays, although the Nokia 6020 has a little worse resolution of 128 x 128px. The Nokia 6020 counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Motorola W355, because it has 3,58 MB internal storage. The Nokia 6020 captures much better videos and photos than Motorola W355.
The Motorola W355 has greater battery performance than Nokia 6020, because it has 880mAh of battery capacity instead of 760mAh.
The Nokia 6020 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.