Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.3 | 27.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 7.0 |
| -- | 2003-06-16 |
| 3.89 x 1.77 x 0.73 inches | 4.28 x 2.29 x 0.93 inches |
| 3.35 ounces | 4.40 ounces |
| $ 505.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 176 x 208 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 1,02 MB internal memory | 6,14 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | MMC external memory slot |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 880mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 210 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6600 has a score of 27.6, which is slightly better than Motorola W355's 25.3 global score. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing, Nokia 6600 is a incredibly thicker and notably heavier cellphone than the Motorola W355. The Nokia 6600 and Motorola W355 both feature really similar processors, both have 0 cpu cores.
Nokia 6600 features a display that's just as good as the display in Motorola W355, although the Nokia 6600 also has a higher resolution of 208 x 176 pixels. The Nokia 6600 features a way bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola W355, because it has 5,12 MB more internal storage. The Motorola W355 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Nokia 6600, because it has 880mAh of battery capacity.
Nokia 6600 counts with a greater camera than Motorola W355.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Nokia 6600 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.