Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.634.2
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
2007-03-272008-04-22
3.89 x 1.77 x 0.70 inches4.25 x 1.71 x 0.41 inches
3.88 ounces2.75 ounces
$ 90.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
102 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.26.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
30,72 MB internal memory30,72 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.40.4
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
--220 x 176 video resolution
3.634.73
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
950mAh Li-Ion Battery1020mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
450 hours standby time
4.2 hours talk time
406 hours standby time
5.3 hours talk time
2.482.64
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

Nokia 5220 XpressMusic is a little bit better than the Motorola W385, with a overall score of 34.2 against 32.6. The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic construction is newer, notably thinner and noticeably lighter than Motorola W385. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic features a CPU that is very similar to Motorola W385's processor, both have 0 processing cores.

Nokia 5220 XpressMusic features a much better looking display than Motorola W385, because it has a way greater count of pixels per screen inch and a much higher resolution of 320 x 240. The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic and Motorola W385 have quite similar storage for games and applications, both of them have the same internal memory.

The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic counts with a greater camera than Motorola W385, because it has a lot better resolution camera. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic has just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola W385, because it has 1020mAh of battery capacity.

Nokia 5220 XpressMusic is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola W385, which makes it an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.