Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.339
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--Symbian 9.4
2007-03-272010-08-24
3.89 x 1.77 x 0.71 inches4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches
3.42 ounces3.77 ounces
--Blue, Gray, Purple, Red and White
$ 59.00$ 59.00
Display / Screen
--2.8 inches
128 x 160 pixels 360 x 640 pixels
TFTTFT
102 pixels per inch262 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.27.2
processorARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.48
Storage
5,12 MB internal memory52,22 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
0.21.4
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.515.28
GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.3
Battery Life
850mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
200 hours standby time
8.3 hours talk time
450 hours standby time
7.7 hours talk time
2.322.56
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.0, EDR
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Nokia 5250 is much better than the Motorola W395, having a 39 score against 33.3. Although Nokia 5250 is a little bit heavier than Motorola W395, it's notably thinner and also a lot newer. The Nokia 5250 features a way better looking display than Motorola W395, because it has a lot better count of pixels per inch in the display and a much higher 640 x 360 resolution.

Nokia 5250 features a better performing processing unit than Motorola W395, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster). Nokia 5250 counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola W395, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Nokia 5250 takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola W395, because it has a much higher 2 mega-pixels resolution back camera.

The Nokia 5250 counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola W395, because it has a 1000mAh battery size.

The Nokia 5250 and the Motorola W395 cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.