Search


Compare phones

Global Score
2628.2
Basic Information
NECNokia
--Symbian 7.0
--2004-01-15
3.30 x 1.60 x 0.80 inches4.28 x 2.29 x 0.93 inches
3.28 ounces4.37 ounces
$ 615.00$ 135.00
128 x 160 pixels 176 x 208 pixels
TFTTFT
No touch screenNo touch screen
33
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
4,71 MB internal memory12,29 MB internal memory
No SD card slotMMC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.21.52
Camera
0.30 MP0.30 MP
3.633.63
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.3
Battery Life
700mAh Li-Ion Battery850mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
220 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
192 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.082.32
Other Features
--Bluetooth 1.1
Infra-red portInfra-red port

Comparison review

The Nokia 6620 has a score of 28.2, which is a bit better than the NEC 232 / e232's overall score of 26. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Nokia 6620 is a much heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the NEC 232 / e232. The NEC 232 / e232 and the Nokia 6620 both count with incredibly similar processing units, both of them have the same number of cores.

The NEC 232 / e232 and the Nokia 6620 have really similar displays, although the Nokia 6620 also has a higher 208 x 176 resolution. The Nokia 6620 features a camera that's just as good as the NEC 232 / e232 one, both of them have the same resolution back-facing camera. The Nokia 6620 counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than NEC 232 / e232, because it has 12,29 MB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports up to 32 GB.

The Nokia 6620 features improved battery duration than NEC 232 / e232, because it has a 21 percent more battery size.

The Nokia 6620 not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.