Search


Compare phones

Global Score
2628.6
Basic Information
NECNokia
--Symbian 8.0
--2004-06-14
3.30 x 1.60 x 0.80 inches4.33 x 2.36 x 0.81 inches
3.28 ounces4.47 ounces
$ 615.00$ 269.00
128 x 160 pixels 176 x 208 pixels
TFTTFT
No touch screenNo touch screen
33
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
4,71 MB internal memory10,24 MB internal memory
No SD card slotRS-MMC external memory slot
0.20.2
Camera
0.30 MP1.30 MP
--220 x 176 video resolution
3.634.51
EDGE and GSMUMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.4
Battery Life
700mAh Li-Ion Battery900mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
220 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
264 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
2.082.4
Other Features
--Bluetooth
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

Nokia 6630 is a bit better than NEC 232 / e232, getting a overall score of 28.6 against 26. Nokia 6630's body is just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier than the NEC 232 / e232. The Nokia 6630 and NEC 232 / e232 count with very similar screens, although the Nokia 6630 also has a higher 208 x 176 resolution.

Nokia 6630 features as much memory to install games and applications as the NEC 232 / e232 one, although the Nokia 6630 also has more internal memory capacity. Nokia 6630 counts with a processor that is very similar to the processor in NEC 232 / e232, both have the same number of cores. Nokia 6630 has superior battery life than NEC 232 / e232, because it has a 900mAh battery capacity against 700mAh.

Nokia 6630 captures much clearer photographs and videos than NEC 232 / e232, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher 1.3 megapixels resolution.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Nokia 6630 is also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.