Compare phones
Kyocera Marbl
K132| Global Score | |
| 22.5 | 24.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| NEC | Kyocera |
| -- | 2006-09-13 |
| 3.85 x 2.00 x 0.98 inches | 3.39 x 1.73 x 0.83 inches |
| 3.50 ounces | 3.28 ounces |
| $ 2489.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 162 x 216 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFD | -- |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 180 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.4 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Kyocera Marbl is just a bit better than the NEC 515, having a overall score of 24.5 against 22.5. The Kyocera Marbl body is thinner and just a bit lighter than NEC 515. Kyocera Marbl features a CPU that's just as good as the processor in NEC 515, both of them have a 0-Core processor. Kyocera Marbl features a much better looking display than NEC 515, although it has a way worse resolution of 128 x 128px.
Kyocera Marbl's storage capacity for applications and games is very similar to NEC 515's one. Kyocera Marbl features just a little better battery performance than NEC 515, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity. Kyocera Marbl's camera is very similar to NEC 515's camera.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Kyocera Marbl is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.