Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.5 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| NEC | Nokia |
| -- | 2004-05-31 |
| 4.10 x 1.90 x 1.10 inches | 4.11 x 1.74 x 0.73 inches |
| 4.03 ounces | 3.03 ounces |
| $ 595.00 | $ 519.00 |
| 162 x 216 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 4,61 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 0.10 MP | 0.30 MP |
| -- | 220 x 176 video resolution |
| 3.08 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 760mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 150 hours standby time 5.4 hours talk time | 280 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.16 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 3220 has an overall score of 27.9, which is a little bit better than the NEC 525's 25.5 general score. Nokia 3220's design is much thinner and way lighter than NEC 525. Nokia 3220's processor is just as good as NEC 525's CPU, both have 0 processing cores. Nokia 3220 counts with a screen that's very similar to NEC 525's screen, although the Nokia 3220 has a much lower 128 x 128 resolution.
The Nokia 3220 captures much clearer videos and photos than NEC 525, because it has a camera in the back with a lot higher 0.3 mega pixels resolution. Nokia 3220 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than NEC 525. The NEC 525 features just a little better battery life than Nokia 3220, because it has a 5% greater battery capacity.
The Nokia 3220 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.