Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.4 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.0 |
| 2020-04-16 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.80 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Charcoal, Cyan and Sand | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm 215 QM215 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.04 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is way better than Nokia 1.3, having a global score of 71.5 against 58.4. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has older 4.0 version while Nokia 1.3 has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a lighter and a little thinner phone than the Nokia 1.3.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a bit better processing unit than Nokia 1.3, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a more vivid screen than Nokia 1.3, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount per screen inch.
Galaxy S III Cricket captures much better pictures and videos than Nokia 1.3. Both of them have the same video frame rates, the same resolution back facing camera and the same video resolution. The Nokia 1.3 features a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has only 16 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 400 GB.
The Nokia 1.3 features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket costs exactly the same than the Nokia 1.3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.