Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim
SM-G3812B| Global Score | |
| 58.4 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.2 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2014-03-15 |
| 5.80 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
| Charcoal, Cyan and Sand | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 100.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 295 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm 215 QM215 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.04 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 5.94 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has a score of 60.4, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 1.3's 58.4 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim is notably older and a little thicker than Nokia 1.3, it's body is still lighter. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has the previous 4.2 version and Nokia 1.3 has Android 11.
The Galaxy S3 Slim has a little sharper display than Nokia 1.3, although it has a much lower resolution of 960 x 540 pixels, a way smaller screen and a bit less pixels per screen inch. The Nokia 1.3 features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 400 GB and 16 GB internal storage capacity.
Nokia 1.3 counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim. They have 1 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Nokia 1.3 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2100mAh. Nokia 1.3 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Nokia 1.3 also has a back camera with much more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.