Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.8 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2007-05-03 | 2008-01-07 |
| 4.00 x 1.73 x 0.68 inches | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| 2.71 ounces | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 329.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 96 x 68 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.48 |
Comparison review
Motorola W270 has a global score of 25.6, which is just a bit better than Nokia 1200's global score of 23.8. The Motorola W270 construction is somewhat heavier but thinner than the Nokia 1200, and both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Motorola W270 has a bit sharper screen than Nokia 1200, because it has a lot better resolution of 128 x 128 pixels.
Motorola W270 counts with as much memory capacity to install applications and games as the Nokia 1200. Motorola W270 has a CPU that's very similar to Nokia 1200's processor, they have the same number of cores. Motorola W270 has superior battery performance than Nokia 1200, because it has 940mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola W270 has a camera that's just as good as the Nokia 1200 one.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola W270 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.