Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.8 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| 2007-05-03 | 2005-06-03 |
| 4.00 x 1.73 x 0.68 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 2.71 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 329.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 96 x 68 pixels | 96 x 68 pixels |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.4 |
Comparison review
Nokia 1600 is slightly better than Nokia 1200, having a 26 score against 23.8. Nokia 1600's body is just a bit thinner than Nokia 1200, but it is just a bit heavier and was released just 23 months before. The Nokia 1600 has a much sharper display than Nokia 1200. Both of them have an equal resolution of 68 x 96 pixels.
Nokia 1600 and Nokia 1200 feature very similar memory to install games and applications. The Nokia 1600's processor is very similar to Nokia 1200's CPU, both of them have a 0-Core CPU. The Nokia 1600 features greater battery performance than Nokia 1200, because it has 900mAh of battery capacity. Nokia 1200 and Nokia 1600 have similar cameras.
Nokia 1600 not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.