Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.6 | 28.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.22 x 1.78 x 0.60 inches | 4.37 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches |
| 2.89 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 269.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.4 inches | 1.6 inches |
| 96 x 68 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| 84 pixels per inch | 113 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.7 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 528 hours standby time 8.5 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9.2 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.48 |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola W230 has an overall score of 28.8, which is just a bit better than Nokia 1280's 26.6 global score. The Motorola W230 design is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Nokia 1280. The Motorola W230 counts with a processor that's very similar to the Nokia 1280 one, they have the same number of cores.
Motorola W230 has a brighter screen than Nokia 1280, because it has a bit larger screen, a much better resolution of 128 x 128 pixels and a better number of pixels per inch in the display. Motorola W230's camera is very similar to the camera in Nokia 1280. The Motorola W230 has as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as Nokia 1280.
Nokia 1280 features a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola W230, because it has a 9% larger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Motorola W230 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.