Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.6 | 31.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 0000-00-00 | 2008-09-02 |
| 4.17 x 1.79 x 0.55 inches | 3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches |
| 2.42 ounces | 2.70 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | -- |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 114 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | GPU |
| 5.94 | 5.76 |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1020mAh Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 864 hours standby time 13 hours talk time | 4.4 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung SPH-M320 is just a bit better than the Nokia 130, having a overall score of 31.4 against 28.6. The Samsung SPH-M320 is a much thicker and heavier phone than Nokia 130. Nokia 130 features a bit superior processor than Samsung SPH-M320, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 130 also has a GPU.
The Nokia 130 has a lot better looking screen than Samsung SPH-M320. Both have an equal 160 x 128px resolution. Samsung SPH-M320 features a way better camera than Nokia 130. The Nokia 130 features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 32 GB.
Nokia 130 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has 1020mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung SPH-M320 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.