Search


Compare phones

Global Score
2627.4
Basic Information
NokiaKyocera
2005-06-032006-04-05
4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches3.50 x 1.80 x 1.00 inches
3.00 ounces4.00 ounces
$ 100.00$ 89.00
96 x 68 pixels 176 x 220 pixels
--TFT
65 pixels per inch--
No touch screenNo touch screen
4.63.1
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
No SD card slotmicroSD external memory slot
Camera
--1.30 MP
04.51
GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.10.1
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
450 hours standby time
5.5 hours talk time
163 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.42.56
Other Features
--Bluetooth 1.2
--GPS
--Infra-red port
--FM Radio

Comparison review

Kyocera K822 is just a bit better than Nokia 1600, getting a score of 27.4 against 26. Even though the Kyocera K822 is newer than the Nokia 1600, it is much thicker and incredibly heavier. Nokia 1600 has a much better looking screen than Kyocera K822, although it has a much lower resolution of 68 x 96.

The Kyocera K822 counts with a CPU that's just as good as Nokia 1600's CPU, they have the same number of cores. Kyocera K822 and Nokia 1600 count with really similar storage capacity for games and applications. The Kyocera K822 takes much better videos and photos than Nokia 1600. The Kyocera K822 features just a bit longer battery duration than Nokia 1600, because it has a 1000mAh battery size.

Kyocera K822 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.