Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.0 |
| 2005-06-03 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 3.00 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 4.8 inches |
| 96 x 68 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 65 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 4.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 0 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 0.1 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a lot better than the Nokia 1600, having a 71.5 score against 26. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket's design is extremely thinner but incredibly heavier than Nokia 1600. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a lot better hardware performance than Nokia 1600, because it has an extra GPU and more cores.
Galaxy S III Cricket features a much sharper display than Nokia 1600, because it has a lot better number of pixels per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels. Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than Nokia 1600, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 64 GB.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a way better camera than Nokia 1600. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a superior battery life than Nokia 1600, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity against 900mAh.
Galaxy S III Cricket and the Nokia 1600 cost the same, making it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.