Search


Compare phones

Global Score
26.554.2
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
--bada 2.0
--2011-08-30
4.22 x 1.77 x 0.59 inches4.96 x 2.53 x 0.39 inches
2.77 ounces4.30 ounces
Black, Blue, Gray and Red--
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 75.00$ 75.00
Display / Screen
--4 inches
128 x 160 pixels 480 x 800 pixels
TFTSuper AMOLED
73 pixels per inch233 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
4.87.6
processorScorpion (Single-Core 1400 MHz) processor
GPU GPU
5.767.65
Storage
--3,07 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
03.62
Camera
--5.00 MP + 0.30 MP
--1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution
06.71
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.13.5
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
540 hours standby time
8.5 hours talk time
480 hours standby time
8.5 hours talk time
2.243.28
Other Features
--Bluetooth 3.0
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Samsung Wave 3 is way better than Nokia 1616, having a 54.2 score against 26.5. Samsung Wave 3's construction is a lot thinner but incredibly heavier than the Nokia 1616. Samsung Wave 3 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Nokia 1616, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster).

The Samsung Wave 3 has a much better looking display than Nokia 1616, because it has a way higher 800 x 480 resolution and a lot greater count of pixels per display inch. Samsung Wave 3 features a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Nokia 1616, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 32 GB.

Samsung Wave 3 features a much better camera than Nokia 1616. The Samsung Wave 3 has a much longer battery performance than Nokia 1616, because it has a 1500mAh battery size instead of 800mAh.

Samsung Wave 3 and the Nokia 1616 cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.