Search


Compare phones

Global Score
24.268.6
Basic Information
NokiaLG
--Android 10
2007-05-032020-07-13
4.09 x 1.73 x 0.70 inches5.82 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches
2.82 ounces5.15 ounces
--Silver
--Plastic and Plastic
$ 39.00$ 40.00
Display / Screen
--5.7 inches
128 x 160 pixels 1520 x 720 pixels
LCDIPS LCD
--295 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
37.4
Performance
--MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset
processorArm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor
--2 GB RAM
GPUIMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU
5.769
Storage
--32 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
05.8
Camera
--13.00 MP + 5.00 MP
--f/1.80 aperture
--0.33 inches (1/3") sensor
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
09.02
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
GSMLTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA
SIMNano SIM
0.16.7
Battery Life
1020mAh Li-Ion Battery3000mAh Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
420 hours standby time
8 hours talk time
--
2.644.96
Other Features
--Bluetooth 5.0
--GPS
--Fingerprint ID Scanner
--Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
FM RadioFM Radio

Comparison review

LG K8x is way better than Nokia 1650, with a general score of 68.6 against 24.2. The LG K8x body is newer and a lot thinner, but also way heavier than the Nokia 1650. The LG K8x has a really superior hardware performance than Nokia 1650, because it has a greater number of cores. LG K8x features a much sharper display than Nokia 1650, because it has a way higher resolution of 720 x 1520 pixels.

LG K8x counts with a way better camera than Nokia 1650. The LG K8x has a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 1650. The LG K8x features a much better battery lifetime than Nokia 1650, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 1020mAh.

LG K8x costs a little more than Nokia 1650, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.