Compare phones
Motorola W175
W175, W175g, W180| Global Score | |
| 24.2 | 28.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2007-05-03 | 2007-10-11 |
| 4.09 x 1.73 x 0.70 inches | 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches |
| 2.82 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 39.00 | $ 40.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 420 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.48 |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola W175 has a global score of 28.6, which is much better than Nokia 1650's 24.2 general score. The Motorola W175 construction is just a bit heavier but extremely thinner than Nokia 1650, and both of them were only released 5 months apart. Motorola W175 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Nokia 1650, although it has a quite lower resolution of 128 x 128.
Motorola W175's processor is very similar to the Nokia 1650 one, both of them have the same number of cores. The Motorola W175 features a camera that is very similar to the camera in Nokia 1650. The Motorola W175's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as Nokia 1650's one.
The Nokia 1650 has a little better battery performance than Motorola W175, because it has a 9 percent greater battery size.
Motorola W175 costs a little more than the Nokia 1650, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.