Compare phones
Nokia 1661
1661, 1662| Global Score | |
| 24.2 | 27.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| 2007-05-03 | 2008-11-04 |
| 4.09 x 1.73 x 0.70 inches | 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches |
| 2.82 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 39.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 420 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 500 hours standby time 3.9 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.32 |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 1661 has a global score of 27.3, which is better than the Nokia 1650's general score of 24.2. The Nokia 1661 construction is newer and a lot thinner than the Nokia 1650's, although it's just a little bit heavier. Nokia 1661 counts with a CPU that's very similar to the Nokia 1650 one, they have 0 processing cores.
Nokia 1661 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Nokia 1650. They have the same exact 160 x 128 resolution. Nokia 1661's camera is very similar to the camera in Nokia 1650. Nokia 1661 counts with as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Nokia 1650.
The Nokia 1650 features improved battery performance than Nokia 1661, because it has a 19% more battery capacity.
The Nokia 1661 costs a bit more than the Nokia 1650, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.