Compare phones
Samsung Entro
SPH-M270| Global Score | |
| 24.2 | 30.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2007-05-03 | 2012-08-03 |
| 4.09 x 1.73 x 0.70 inches | 3.77 x 1.88 x 0.75 inches |
| 2.82 ounces | 3.50 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| $ 39.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.7 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | -- |
| LCD | -- |
| -- | 235 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 6.1 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery | -- |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 420 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 480 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 1.36 |
| -- | GPS |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Entro is much better than the Nokia 1650, with a overall score of 30.1 against 24.2. Samsung Entro is a notably newer phone than Nokia 1650, but it's heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Samsung Entro has a CPU that is just as good as Nokia 1650's processor, both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Entro has a much better looking display than Nokia 1650. The Nokia 1650 and the Samsung Entro feature really similar cameras. The Samsung Entro features as much memory to install games and applications as the Nokia 1650 one. Nokia 1650 has a way better battery performance than Samsung Entro.
The Samsung Entro costs a little more than Nokia 1650, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.