Compare phones
Nokia 1661
1661, 1662Motorola W175
W175, W175g, W180| Global Score | |
| 27.3 | 28.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2008-11-04 | 2007-10-11 |
| 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches | 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches |
| 2.89 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | -- |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| 114 pixels per inch | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 500 hours standby time 3.9 hours talk time | 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time |
| 2.32 | 2.48 |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola W175 is just a bit better than the Nokia 1661, getting a general score of 28.6 against 27.3. Despite being the best phone we are comparing here, Motorola W175's design is older, just a little heavier and a bit thicker than the Nokia 1661. The Nokia 1661 and the Motorola W175 have similar CPUs, they have 0 CPU cores.
The Nokia 1661 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola W175, because it has a little higher 160 x 128 resolution and a little bit higher pixels amount per screen inch. Motorola W175 counts with a camera that's just as good as the camera in Nokia 1661. Motorola W175 has as much storage for applications and games as the Nokia 1661 one.
The Motorola W175 has a bit superior battery performance than Nokia 1661, because it has 940mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola W175 costs exactly the same than the Nokia 1661, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.