Compare phones
Nokia 1661
1661, 1662Samsung Entro
SPH-M270| Global Score | |
| 27.3 | 30.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2008-11-04 | 2012-08-03 |
| 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches | 3.77 x 1.88 x 0.75 inches |
| 2.89 ounces | 3.50 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 1.7 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | -- |
| TFT | -- |
| 114 pixels per inch | 235 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 6.1 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 860mAh Li-Ion Battery | -- |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 500 hours standby time 3.9 hours talk time | 480 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time |
| 2.32 | 1.36 |
| -- | GPS |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Entro is much better than Nokia 1661, having a 30.1 score against 27.3. Samsung Entro is a newer cellphone than the Nokia 1661, but it's way thicker and heavier. The Samsung Entro has a sharper display than Nokia 1661, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better display pixel density.
The Samsung Entro's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Nokia 1661 one. Samsung Entro and Nokia 1661 both count with really similar processors, both of them have 0 CPU cores. Nokia 1661 and Samsung Entro count with incredibly similar cameras. Nokia 1661 has a really longer battery life than Samsung Entro.
Samsung Entro and the Nokia 1661 cost exactly the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.