Search


Compare phones

Global Score
27.342.3
Basic Information
NokiaHTC
--Windows Mobile Standard 6.1
2008-11-042009-06-25
4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches
2.89 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches2.4 inches
128 x 160 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
114 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.36
processor Single-Core 528 MHz processor
--192 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.66
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
Camera
--2.00 MP
04.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GSMEV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA
SIMSIM
0.12.9
Battery Life
860mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
500 hours standby time
3.9 hours talk time
324 hours standby time
4.8 hours talk time
2.323.28
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
FM Radio--

Comparison review

HTC Ozone has an overall score of 42.3, which is way better than Nokia 1661 US's general score of 27.3. HTC Ozone's body is a little thinner but heavier than Nokia 1661 US, and both of them were only released with a couple months difference. HTC Ozone has a sharper display than Nokia 1661 US, because it has a lot larger display, a lot better 240 x 320 resolution and a better pixels quantity per inch in the display.

The HTC Ozone's storage to install applications and games is very similar to the Nokia 1661 US one. HTC Ozone features a more powerful CPU than Nokia 1661 US, because it has 1 more processing cores. HTC Ozone counts with a much better battery performance than Nokia 1661 US, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity.

The HTC Ozone captures way better pictures and videos than Nokia 1661 US.

HTC Ozone costs exactly the same than the Nokia 1661 US, making it easy to pick between these devices.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.