Search


Compare phones

Global Score
27.343.5
Basic Information
NokiaNokia
2008-11-042012-02-27
4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches
2.89 ounces3.74 ounces
--Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches2.4 inches
128 x 160 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
114 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.36.2
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.767.29
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.92
Camera
--3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
05.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
0.13.6
Battery Life
860mAh Li-Ion Battery1430mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
500 hours standby time
3.9 hours talk time
707 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
2.323.2
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Nokia Asha 302 is much better than the Nokia 1661 US, getting a 43.5 score against 27.3. Nokia Asha 302 is a way heavier cellphone than Nokia 1661 US, but both are equally thin. The Nokia Asha 302 features a much better looking display than Nokia 1661 US, because it has a much better resolution of 240 x 320px, more pixels per inch in the screen and a way larger screen.

Nokia Asha 302 features a way better processing power than Nokia 1661 US, because it has a higher number of cores. The Nokia Asha 302 features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 1661 US, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 32 GB.

The Nokia Asha 302 features a much better battery life than Nokia 1661 US, because it has a 1430mAh battery size. Nokia Asha 302 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Nokia 1661 US.

Nokia Asha 302 costs exactly the same than the Nokia 1661 US.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.