Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2008-04-02 | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.25 x 1.80 x 0.60 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 2.60 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 6 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 102 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32,77 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.4 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 424 hours standby time 7.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.08 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a lot better than the Nokia 1680 classic, getting a general score of 82.5 against 31.1. Google Pixel 2 XL's body is newer and notably thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Nokia 1680 classic. The Google Pixel 2 XL has an extremely better processing unit than Nokia 1680 classic, because it has a higher number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a much better looking display than Nokia 1680 classic, because it has a much better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of display. Google Pixel 2 XL captures greater photographs and videos than Nokia 1680 classic, because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 1680 classic, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 2 XL features a much better battery life than Nokia 1680 classic, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity against 700mAh.
The Google Pixel 2 XL costs a bit more than Nokia 1680 classic, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.