Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2008-04-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.25 x 1.80 x 0.60 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 2.60 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.5 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 102 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32,77 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.4 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 424 hours standby time 7.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is way better than Nokia 1680 classic's general score of 31.1. Google Pixel 3's construction is newer and noticeably thinner than Nokia 1680 classic's, although it is also incredibly heavier. The Google Pixel 3 has a much greater hardware performance than Nokia 1680 classic, because it has a higher number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 has a much better looking screen than Nokia 1680 classic, because it has a way better 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a much better count of pixels per display inch. Google Pixel 3 takes greater photographs and videos than Nokia 1680 classic, because it has a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Google Pixel 3 has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 1680 classic, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3 features a superior battery life than Nokia 1680 classic, because it has a 316% larger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 costs a little more money than the Nokia 1680 classic, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.