Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.6 | 28.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.21 x 1.77 x 0.60 inches | 4.37 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches |
| 2.77 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Red | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.6 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| 73 pixels per inch | 113 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 816 hours standby time 13 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9.2 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.48 |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola W230 has a general score of 28.8, which is just a bit better than Nokia 1800's overall score of 26.6. Motorola W230's design is just a little thinner but just a little heavier than Nokia 1800. The Motorola W230 counts with a sharper display than Nokia 1800, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 128 x 128, it also counts with a much higher screen density.
Motorola W230's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to Nokia 1800's one. The Motorola W230 counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the processing unit in Nokia 1800, both of them have 0 cpu cores. The Motorola W230 and Nokia 1800 feature incredibly similar cameras.
The Nokia 1800 has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola W230, because it has a 9 percent larger battery capacity.
Motorola W230 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.