Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
LTEGT-S7275
| Global Score | |
| 58.4 | 62.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.2.2 |
| 2018-08-10 | 2013-06-10 |
| 6.05 x 3.06 x 0.38 inches | 4.77 x 2.47 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 4.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 480 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 267 pixels per inch | 233 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 chipset | Broadcom BCM21664 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Broadcom VideoCore IV (250 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 5.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 6.71 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 8 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 has an overall score of 62.2, which is a bit better than the Nokia 2.1's overall score of 58.4. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 is noticeably older and a little thicker than the Nokia 2.1, it's construction is still incredibly lighter. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 has the previous 4.2.2 version while Nokia 2.1 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nokia 2.1 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Ace 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have 1 GB of RAM, the Nokia 2.1 also counts with a larger number of cores. Galaxy Ace 3 has a little bit better looking screen than Nokia 2.1, although it has a way smaller display, a quite lower number of pixels per display inch and a lot worse 800 x 480 resolution.
The Nokia 2.1 shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a much higher 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a way higher 8 megapixels resolution. The Nokia 2.1 counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Ace 3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Nokia 2.1 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 128 GB.
Nokia 2.1 has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 1800mAh.
The Galaxy Ace 3 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.