Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.6 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-09-23 | 2015-10-27 |
| 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Charcoal, Dusk and Fjord | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 139.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.81 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a score of 74.8, which is much better than Nokia 2.4's 65.6 overall score. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is a noticeably older and a bit thicker phone than the Nokia 2.4, but Motorola was able to make it lighter anyway. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has older 5.1 version and Nokia 2.4 has Android 11 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features an incredibly better screen than Nokia 2.4, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher screen density and a way better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 2.4, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Nokia 2.4 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a greater number of 2 gigahertz cores. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 captures much clearer photos and videos than Nokia 2.4, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Nokia 2.4 counts with better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is also cheaper than the Nokia 2.4, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.