Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.6 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.0 |
| 2020-09-23 | 0000-00-00 |
| 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Charcoal, Dusk and Fjord | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 139.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.81 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is just a bit better than the Nokia 2.4, getting a general score of 71.5 against 65.6. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket's design has the same thickness than Nokia 2.4, but it's incredibly lighter. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has an older 4.0 version and Nokia 2.4 has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a sharper display than Nokia 2.4, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a quite lower 1280 x 720px resolution, it also counts with a bit better display density. Nokia 2.4 has a bit better processor than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, and they both have the same RAM amount, the Nokia 2.4 also counts with a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket takes clearer videos and photos than Nokia 2.4, although it has a tinier aperture, a back facing camera with way less megapixels resolution and a worse 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution. The Nokia 2.4 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Nokia 2.4 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Nokia 2.4 counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S III Cricket not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.