Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.435.2
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
--2011-03-09
4.57 x 1.94 x 0.49 inches3.80 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches
3.21 ounces3.20 ounces
Black, Blue, Red, White and YellowGray
$ 105.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)128 x 160 pixels
LCDTFT
167 pixels per inch102 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.95.3
processor processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
65,54 MB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
1.820
Camera
1.30 MP0.30 MP
4.513.63
EDGE, GPRS and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.40.1
Battery Life
--800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
1128 hours standby time
20 hours talk time
300 hours standby time
4.5 hours talk time
1.362.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR

Comparison review

Samsung Factor has a general score of 35.2, which is a bit better than Nokia 206's 33.4 general score. The Samsung Factor is a way thicker but a bit lighter phone than the Nokia 206. Nokia 206 has a brighter display than Samsung Factor, because it has a much greater amount of pixels per display inch, a larger display and a lot higher resolution of 320 x 240 pixels.

Nokia 206 has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Factor, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 32 GB. The Samsung Factor counts with a processor that's just as good as the CPU in Nokia 206, both have the same number of cores. Nokia 206 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Factor, because it has a way better resolution back facing camera.

Samsung Factor has a superior battery lifetime than Nokia 206.

The Samsung Factor is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.