Compare phones
Samsung Chrono
SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A| Global Score | |
| 33 | 36.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2015-01-05 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.57 x 1.97 x 0.51 inches | 3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches |
| 2.77 ounces | 3.14 ounces |
| Black, Green and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| LCD | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 6.3 |
| processor | processor |
| 8 MB RAM | -- |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU |
| 5.85 | 5.94 |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | -- |
| 3.85 | 3.63 |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 696 hours standby time 20 hours talk time | 526 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Samsung Chrono is a little bit better than the Nokia 215, having a overall score of 36.1 against 33. The Samsung Chrono is a way thicker and heavier cellphone than the Nokia 215. Samsung Chrono has a little faster CPU than Nokia 215. Both of them have a 0-Core processing unit and a 320 megahertz graphics co-processor.
Samsung Chrono counts with a bit sharper screen than Nokia 215, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 320 x 240 pixels, the Samsung Chrono also counts with a quite better number of pixels in each inch of display. The Nokia 215 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Chrono. They have a 0.3 MP back-facing camera.
Nokia 215 features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Chrono, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 32 GB. The Nokia 215 has a much better battery duration than Samsung Chrono, because it has a 1100mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Chrono is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.