Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3336.1
Basic Information
NokiaSony
2015-01-052007-02-06
4.57 x 1.97 x 0.51 inches4.17 x 1.88 x 0.66 inches
2.77 ounces3.65 ounces
Black, Green and White--
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 249.00$ 135.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
LCDTFD
167 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
66.3
processor processor
8 MB RAM--
ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU GPU
5.855.76
Storage
--65,54 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotMemory Stick Micro (M2) external memory slot
1.320.5
Camera
0.30 MP3.20 MP
320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution--
3.855.17
EDGE, GPRS and GSMUMTS, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
0.40.2
Battery Life
1100mAh Battery950mAh Li-Polymer Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
696 hours standby time
20 hours talk time
400 hours standby time
10 hours talk time
2.722.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 3.0Bluetooth 2.0
--Infra-red port

Comparison review

Sony Ericsson K810 has a score of 36.1, which is a little bit better than Nokia 215's global score of 33. The Sony Ericsson K810 body is extremely older, incredibly thicker and way heavier than Nokia 215. Sony Ericsson K810 has a bit more vivid display than Nokia 215, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 320 x 240 pixels, the Sony Ericsson K810 also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.

Nokia 215 has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Ericsson K810. The Nokia 215 has just a bit better processing power than Sony Ericsson K810, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 215 also has an extra GPU. The Sony Ericsson K810 features a greater camera than Nokia 215, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels.

Nokia 215 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Sony Ericsson K810, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity.

Sony Ericsson K810 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.