Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2014-02-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.58 x 1.98 x 0.52 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 2.95 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 5.94 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.72 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 696 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.72 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a general score of 82.5, which is a lot better than Nokia 220's overall score of 35.4. Even though Google Pixel 2 XL is a lot heavier than the Nokia 220, it's noticeably thinner and also a lot newer. Google Pixel 2 XL features a lot better performance than Nokia 220, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more CPU cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features an incredibly better looking display than Nokia 220, because it has a way better display density, a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a much larger screen. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 220, although it has no slot for an SD memory card.
The Google Pixel 2 XL captures way better pictures and videos than Nokia 220, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video definition, a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs, a lot bigger aperture to take better photos in low light environments and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a much longer battery duration than Nokia 220, because it has a 220 percent greater battery size.
Google Pixel 2 XL is a little more expensive than Nokia 220, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.