Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.4 | 38.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| 2014-02-24 | 2013-10-22 |
| 4.58 x 1.98 x 0.52 inches | 3.92 x 2.34 x 0.44 inches |
| 2.95 ounces | 3.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Green, Red, White and Yellow |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 145.00 | $ 95.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| LCD | LCD |
| 167 pixels per inch | 133 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6 | 6.2 |
| processor | processor |
| -- | 64 MB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | GPU |
| 5.94 | 5.76 |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| -- | 32.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 5.72 | 6.6 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.2 | 2.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1010mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 696 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | 576 hours standby time 13.7 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| -- | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia Asha 502 is just a bit better than Nokia 220, having a 38.8 score against 35.4. The Nokia Asha 502 body is heavier but thinner than the Nokia 220, and both of them were released only 4 months apart. The Nokia Asha 502 has just a bit better screen than Nokia 220, because although it has a just a little worse display pixel density, and they both have the same exact 320 x 240 resolution, the Nokia Asha 502 also counts with a bigger display.
Nokia 220 features a bit better CPU than Nokia Asha 502, and although they both have a 0-Core CPU, the Nokia 220 also has a graphics co-processor. The Nokia Asha 502 counts with as much memory capacity to install games and applications as Nokia 220, both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 32 GB.
Nokia 220 has a little longer battery performance than Nokia Asha 502, because it has a 9% greater battery capacity. The Nokia Asha 502 has a much better camera than Nokia 220, and although they both have the same 15 fps video frame rate and the same 320x240 video quality, the Nokia Asha 502 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality photographs, a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a back facing camera with a way better 5 MP resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia Asha 502 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.