Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.342.3
Basic Information
NokiaHTC
--Windows Mobile Standard 6.1
2008-01-222009-06-25
4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches
2.57 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 69.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
128 x 160 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
82 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
4.96
processor Single-Core 528 MHz processor
--192 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.66
Storage
10,24 MB internal memory--
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.20
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
3.634.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMEV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA
SIMSIM
0.32.9
Battery Life
870mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
580 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
324 hours standby time
4.8 hours talk time
2.43.28
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The HTC Ozone is way better than Nokia 2600 classic, with a 42.3 score against 31.3. The HTC Ozone design is newer, but a little thicker and much heavier than Nokia 2600 classic. The HTC Ozone counts with a much better display than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a much greater display pixels density and a lot better 240 x 320 resolution.

Nokia 2600 classic counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than HTC Ozone, although it has no SD extension slot. The HTC Ozone has a quite superior performance than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a larger number of cores. The HTC Ozone has a very superior camera than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a much higher resolution camera in the back.

HTC Ozone has a way better battery lifetime than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a 1500mAh battery capacity.

The HTC Ozone costs a bit more than Nokia 2600 classic, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.