Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.3 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2008-01-22 | 2019-06-14 |
| 4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 2.57 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | White |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 69.00 | $ 70.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.5 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 82 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 10,24 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3.63 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 870mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 580 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 3.1 C is way better than Nokia 2600 classic, with a 64.8 score against 31.3. Nokia 3.1 C is a extremely newer and extremely thinner phone than the Nokia 2600 classic, although it's extremely heavier. Nokia 3.1 C has a much faster processing unit than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a greater number of faster cores.
Nokia 3.1 C has an incredibly better looking screen than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has way more pixels per inch of screen and a lot better resolution of 720 x 1440px. The Nokia 3.1 C has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 128 GB.
The Nokia 3.1 C features a superior battery life than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a 2990mAh battery size instead of 870mAh. The Nokia 3.1 C takes greater pictures and videos than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a camera with much more mega pixels.
Nokia 3.1 C costs a bit more than Nokia 2600 classic, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.