Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.3 | 43.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| 2008-01-22 | 2012-02-27 |
| 4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches | 4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches |
| 2.57 ounces | 3.74 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow |
| $ 69.00 | $ 70.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.4 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 82 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 6.2 |
| processor | Single-Core 1000 MHz processor |
| -- | 128 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 7.29 |
| Storage | |
| 10,24 MB internal memory | 102,4 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 1.92 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 3.20 MP |
| -- | 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 3.63 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 3.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 870mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1430mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 580 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | 707 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia Asha 302 is much better than the Nokia 2600 classic, getting a 43.5 score against 31.3. The Nokia Asha 302 construction is noticeably newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Nokia 2600 classic. The Nokia Asha 302 has a much better performing CPU than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a greater number of cores.
Nokia Asha 302 counts with a much better screen than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a way better resolution of 240 x 320 and a way higher display pixel density. Nokia Asha 302 has much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 32 GB and 92,16 MB more internal storage.
The Nokia Asha 302 shoots way better pictures and videos than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a camera in the back with a much better 3.2 megapixels resolution. Nokia Asha 302 features a much better battery lifetime than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has 1430mAh of battery capacity instead of 870mAh.
Nokia Asha 302 is a bit more expensive than Nokia 2600 classic, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.