Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 4.24 x 1.84 x 0.79 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 3.33 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.7 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| CSTN | OLED |
| -- | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4,1 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 0 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.4 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a lot better than the Nokia 2600, having an 81.9 score against 23.6. The Google Pixel 4 construction is heavier but thinner than the Nokia 2600. The Google Pixel 4 has a way better looking screen than Nokia 2600, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels.
The Google Pixel 4 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 2600, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better performance than Nokia 2600, because it has a greater number of cores. Google Pixel 4 counts with a greater camera than Nokia 2600.
Google Pixel 4 features a much longer battery duration than Nokia 2600, because it has a 2800mAh battery capacity against 900mAh.
The Google Pixel 4 is a little more expensive than the Nokia 2600, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.