Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.6 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | 2008-01-07 |
| 4.24 x 1.84 x 0.79 inches | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| 3.33 ounces | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 325.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| CSTN | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 4,1 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 0 |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.48 |
Comparison review
Motorola W270 has a score of 25.6, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 2600's 23.6 global score. Motorola W270's design is notably thinner and just a bit lighter than Nokia 2600. Motorola W270 and Nokia 2600 count with really similar processors, both of them have the same number of cores. Motorola W270 features a bit better display than Nokia 2600. They have an equal resolution of 128 x 128 pixels.
Nokia 2600 and Motorola W270 feature incredibly similar cameras. The Nokia 2600 features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola W270, although it has no SD extension slot. Motorola W270 has just a bit longer battery life than Nokia 2600, because it has a 4% more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Motorola W270 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.