Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.6 | 24.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | 2006-04-04 |
| 4.24 x 1.84 x 0.79 inches | 3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches |
| 3.33 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 325.00 | $ 75.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| CSTN | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 4,1 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0 |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 212 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.32 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola W315 is slightly better than the Nokia 2600, having a 24.7 score against 23.6. The Motorola W315 is a somewhat lighter but just a bit thicker device than Nokia 2600. The Motorola W315 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Nokia 2600, because it has a quite better 160 x 128 resolution.
Nokia 2600 features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola W315. Nokia 2600 and Motorola W315 count with very similar processors, they have a 0-Core processing unit. The Motorola W315's camera is just as good as Nokia 2600's camera. The Nokia 2600 has just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola W315, because it has a 6% greater battery capacity.
Motorola W315 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.