Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.6 | 25.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| -- | 2007-05-03 |
| 4.24 x 1.84 x 0.79 inches | 4.01 x 1.73 x 0.68 inches |
| 3.33 ounces | 2.71 ounces |
| $ 325.00 | $ 80.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 98 x 68 pixels |
| CSTN | STN |
| -- | 43 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 4.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 4,1 MB internal memory | 4,1 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 700mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 365 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.08 |
Comparison review
Nokia 1208 is just a bit better than Nokia 2600, having a global score of 25.5 against 23.6. Nokia 1208 is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the Nokia 2600. The Nokia 1208 features an incredibly better looking screen than Nokia 2600, although it has a lot worse 68 x 98 resolution. Nokia 2600 and Nokia 1208 have very similar memory capacity for games and applications, they have the same 4,1 MB internal memory.
Nokia 1208's CPU is very similar to the processor in Nokia 2600, both of them have 0 cpu cores. Nokia 2600 features better battery lifetime than Nokia 1208, because it has a 900mAh battery capacity against 700mAh. The Nokia 1208 and Nokia 2600 both feature very similar cameras.
The Nokia 1208 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.